Advertisement
The Student Newspaper of DePaul University

The DePaulia

The Student Newspaper of DePaul University

The DePaulia

The Student Newspaper of DePaul University

The DePaulia

No forgiveness granted: Muslims face tradition of backlash for extremism after Charlie Hebdo attack

French Muslims walk past anti-Muslim graffiti painted on a Mosque in Saint-Etienne, France. (Laurent Cipriani | AP)
French Muslims walk past anti-Muslim graffiti painted on a Mosque in Saint-Etienne, France. (Laurent Cipriani | AP)

After the horrific terror attack on the Charlie Hebdo office and other sites in Paris, millions around the world united to demonstrate solidarity for those 17 people who died in the attacks, as well as to express appreciation for free speech.

Lost among the chaos of such solidarity, however, was the acknowledgment of the many Muslims who faced backlash in the aftermath of the al-Qaida-tied attack.

The Union of Islamic Organizations in France claimed there had been more than 50 anti-Muslim attacks in France since the terror incidents, including assaults on French Mosques with firebombs and grenades. Countless other instances of taunting and threats have also occurred since the attacks.

“It often feels necessary for a nation to chase its identity in the face of a disaster, and part of that unfortunately all too often involves backlash against those who get lumped together with the perpetrators,” Amina McCloud, a DePaul Islamic world studies professor, said.

Backlash against Muslim and Arab citizens is, in fact, nothing new or shocking to the Western world. In the United States, there had been numerous attacks on Arabs or “Arab look-alikes” following the 9/11 attacks, with Human Rights Watch reporting a 1,700 percent increase in American hate crimes in the year following that tragedy. Texan Mark Stroman was convicted of murdering a Pakistani and Indian in the days following 9/11, as well as for blinding a third man who was Bangladeshi.

“I did what every American wanted to do after Sept. 11 but didn’t have the nerve,” Stroman said after his arrest.

Rhetoric against Muslims in other nations has also risen in the wake of the international focus on terrorism; U.K. publication The Independent reported that about half of Britain’s Mosques have been attacked since 9/11.

“As a young 20-something Muslim woman, I’ve realized that we’re the generation that has to constantly apologize for 9/11, even though we were children when the event happened,” Ainee Fatima, a DePaul senior and Islamic world studies student, said. “People ask us, ‘why don’t you speak out about (extremism)?’” Fatima said. “Open your eyes and ears. Many of us are speaking up.”

The grave of Ahmed Merabet, a Muslim policeman slain in the Charlie Hebdo attack. (Jacques Brinon | AP)
The grave of Ahmed Merabet, a Muslim policeman slain in the Charlie Hebdo attack. (Jacques Brinon | AP)

Many critics of Islam claim that the religion is predisposed against free speech and criticism of their prophet; that it naturally incites violence and extremism through the idea of Jihad; or that Muslim principles are incompatible with Western ways of life. While discussing Islam, television figurehead Bill Maher said, “When there’s this many bad apples, there’s something wrong with the orchard.”

However, all too often it is forgotten that the global Muslim population is non-homogenous and remains as diverse as any other religious population, with practitioners varying both in their interpretation of Muslim texts and, perhaps more importantly, in their approval of Muslim extremism.

“Remember, in some ways the KKK and Nazi ideologies were rooted in Christian belief,” McCloud said. “But they were never considered to be part of mainstream Christianity. Part of the problem of Western cultures is the tendency to lump unfamiliar cultures together.”

For instance, in the recent Paris attacks Muslim Parisian Lassana Bathily bravely faced danger as he hid potential hostages in the walk-in freezer of a Kosher grocery store that was attacked, then went upstairs alone to speak with the gunman.

When French authorities later stormed the premises of the store, they mistook Bathily for one of the attackers and held him for an hour-and-a-half, according to French media outlet BFMTV.

Other instances of Muslim bravery against extremism have been numerous. One of the policemen who was fatally shot in the Charlie Hebdo attack was Ahmed Merabet, a 42-year-old Muslim.

Yet Muslims have consistently faced Islamophobia and unequal social footing as a result of the aforementioned cultural lumping.

“People in France have all come out for freedom of speech, yet they continue to publicly ban Muslim headwear (referring to laws banning the wearing of hijab head scarves in certain public areas, as well as the full public ban of niqab and burqa veils). It’s hypocrisy,” Fatima said.   

Amid the aftermath of the French attacks, Charlie Hebdo restarted its publication, with the first print edition featuring a cover cartoon with the prophet Muhammad holding a “Je suis Charlie” placard and shedding a tear. Above the cartoon a caption read “all is forgiven.”

Laurent Joffrin, editor of the French newspaper Liberation, told The Independent, “Muhammad is there but presented in a positive way, with a hint of tenderness. Some people expected a provocative front page … Instead, we have a model of political intelligence.”

With backlash against Muslims continuing in France and elsewhere, the world’s Muslim population can only wait and see whether others will give them a hand of acceptance in the future.

View Comments (4)
More to Discover

Comments (4)

Comments are Closed.
All The DePaulia Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest
  • A

    ArafatJan 20, 2015 at 3:06 pm

    Kevin, Are you able to keep track of all the Qur’an-inspired terrorist attacks that have nothing to do with Islam? I ask because I long ago lost count.

    • K

      Kevin GrossJan 21, 2015 at 7:27 pm

      Hey Arafat,

      Thank you for pointing out what you perceive as mistakes in my piece. As far as confusing the terrorists with victims, I get what you mean. After all, the NON MUSLIM Indian gas station owner who was killed by Stroman following 9/11 may, in fact, have been guilty of associating with Muslim extremism based solely on the color of his skin (after all, its a common and completely logical association that we Americans like to make). But hey, I guess extremism is a risk we always have to take into account, considering we live in a nation largely supported by immigrants of color that look, dare I say, Arab.

      Rest assured I didn’t forget about the numerous acts of violence committed at Muslim hands; ISIS is pretty prevalent in the news these days. But I guess I may have forgotten that all Muslims (and Arabs, for that matter) are actually homogenous, and they should be critiqued the same as any ISIS fighter. After all, the violence of a small subset of extremists that exploit readings to justify violence means that ALL Muslims are guilty of belonging to a violent sect of the human population.

      In the Nirvana Sutra, Buddha said, ”When I recall the past, I remember that I was the king of a great state…My name was Senyo, and I loved and venerated the Mahayana sutras…When I heard the Brahmins slandering the vaipulya sutras, I put them to death on the spot. Good men, as a result of that action, I never thereafter fell into hell. O good man! When we accept and defend the Mahayana sutras, we possess innumerable virtues.”

      Quotes like these have been used to justify much of the Buddhist-driven violence that is going on in Myanmar (a phenomenon that Western media tends to overlook a lot, but that’s a discussion for another day.) Yet we continue to portray Buddhism as a “peace driven way of life.” I guess its time we start rethinking our thoughts on that religion, since everyday Buddhists are exactly the same as the extremists in Myanmar (since your reasoning has opened my mind to the fact that all Buddhists must interpret their texts in the same extremist fashion.)

      When we look at any ideological belief – whether it be religious, patriotic, or something within a subculture – we can find something in many of them that has, at one point, been used to justify violence. Maybe we should start marginalizing and discriminating against other random groups of Americans, because you never know who on the streets might exploit their beliefs as an excuse to cut our throats. Come to think of it, I don’t really like people too much anymore – it seems everyone is associated with extremism these days.

      I’ve noticed you tend to comment a lot on the DePaulia’s work, particularly ones pertaining to Islam (I can find your comments at “Je suis Charlie: The Future of Free Press” and “Peacekeepers or resource raiders: The ISIS dilemma”). I’m glad you have nothing better to do than keep track of college newspaper articles and feed everyone your “constructive” criticism. Keep it up!

  • A

    ArafatJan 20, 2015 at 3:04 pm

    Yes Kevin, really great article! Thanks for confusing the terrorists with the victims. Did you pay for your journalism degree?

  • N

    NatalieJan 19, 2015 at 4:10 pm

    Great article, Kevin. A much needed perspective!