Campus conservatives say they are oppressed, others beg to differ
President Donald Trump often speaks about the “Forgotten American:” the average wage earner in middle America who feels as if their voice hasn’t been heard by elites in Washington, D.C. Unfortunately, the “Forgotten American” is also at DePaul in the form of conservative students whose voices aren’t acknowledged without resistance.
Identity politics is one of the biggest problems at DePaul that I have encountered. By far, a major hurdle is that some students believe that if you are a minority on any scale, then you must vote and support leftists by all means. It continues on in that if you do not support leftists, then you are either bigoted or misogynistic.
Jason Hill, a DePaul philosophy professor, called for universities to be defunded due to liberal indoctrination in an opinion piece for The Hill on July 16. Throughout the article, Hill pointed out that college instructors and supposed scholars are teaching their students to reject conservative principles such as free speech, capitalism and individualism.
Not only does Hill state that scholars are teaching students to vocally reject conservative principles, Hill also states that scholars are additionally teaching students to become socialists who latch on to identity politics. He argues that students won’t listen to those with non-left leaning ideologies whatsoever, such as less regulation and the right to bear arms.
“Cultural Marxism […] is simply a guise under which to politically indoctrinate students into becoming socialists who will do anything to prohibit freedom of speech on college campuses,” Hill writes. “We are witnessing a generation that will not tolerate other perspectives, students who will not hear opposing ideologies.”
Sadly, Hill is correct. Some right-wing students frequently face oppression of their free speech. Alex Kerr, a libertarian student, has been disrespected on numerous occasions throughout his DePaul tenure because of his political beliefs.
“I have faced plenty of criticism, hate and anger over my beliefs,” Kerr said. “My views have been mocked by students and professors in classes, which discourages me from speaking up in class sometimes. I have also had students start to get mad and animated about things I’ve said in class. I have plenty of stories and examples, but all in all, I feel like I am not able to voice my views openly most days.”
Similarly, Nick Gricus, president of the DePaul College Republicans, indicated that conservatives seldom get the opportunity to utilize their First Amendment right.
“As a student that has been at the center of countless ideological clashes over the past few years, I can honestly say this: tribalism begets tribalism,” Gricus said. “Conservative students have been cast out of the mainstream discourse on campus after being called every possible name and phobia (and) ism. Sure, campus conservatives are by no means innocent from engaging in similar ploys. But the perpetual finger- pointing will persist until we learn how to communicate with each other.”
Though it is factual that some conservative students have been shut out of discussions, Doug Klain, former secretary for the DePaul College Democrats, is not quite convinced that the campus conservatives are being completely oppressed.
“I have no doubt that they are treated badly in some way, but I don’t think that it’s this black and white thing of Republicans are oppressed at DePaul, liberals are elevated above them,” Klain said. “I think that there’s a lot of ways that Republicans are not treated so well and maybe sometimes do feel silenced […] But at the same time conservatives at DePaul are arguably the most powerful political group on campus, and so it’s really hard to kind of reconcile those two things.”
An integral and overlooked reason why Klain mentioned that the College Republicans are the most powerful group on campus is because they have the financial support to afford bringing speakers, sometimes controversial ones, to campus. Klain noted that some groups that financially help the conservatives out are both the Koch Foundation as well as F.I.R.E., the Foundation for Individual Rights and Education.
Much of the controversy attached to campus conservatives came about because of these speakers. Though they are invited on campus, some of them have been banned because of the potentiality of violence as a result. Previously, DePaul banned conservative commentators like Ben Shapiro and Steven Crowder.
“There’s some people like Gavin McInnes who I think are pretty cut-and-dry and should be denied, who directly advocate for violence,” Klain said. “That is personally my line—let anybody come as long as they’re not advocating for violence, which Milo [Yiannopoulos] did. And at the same time, the conservatives should recognize that some of the people they bring are not leading conservative thinkers.”
Communication is the next step in promoting civil discourse. But in order for this to take place, we need less shouting and more talking. Democratic students are not what DePaul conservatives take issue with. What college conservatives have a problem with is being publicly shamed when they express their beliefs.
“As a conservative student, I love the idea of attending an institution where my beliefs and arguments can constantly be tested and refined,” Gricus said. “However, I do not have that opportunity at an institution where students are taught to avoid, attack and defame opposing people and ideas. The fact of the matter is that the same side that supposedly champions tolerance dominates our nation’s universities and, in reality, espouses intolerance.
Change starts in the classroom. We need professors to create curriculums that allow for universal classroom engagement despite differing beliefs.
I have faith that my fellow Blue Demons will work toward being respectful to one another if instructors take the initiative. Until that happens, DePaul’s political environment will be one in which liberal and conservative views cannot peacefully coexist.
Robert E Klosak • Jun 10, 2019 at 1:59 pm
I withdrew from the Masters program at this University specifically because they seemed to be trying to push a particular political thought and it wasn’t conservative thought.
Bria • Sep 17, 2018 at 12:51 pm
“There’s some people like Gavin McInnes who I think are pretty cut-and-dry and should be denied, who directly advocate for violence…the conservatives should recognize that some of the people they bring are not leading conservative thinkers.”
This statement demonstrates the kind of mindset that enables and justifies direct anti-conservative action. The guy is smart enough to attend DePaul and get elected to lead a pretty significant group, but he doesn’t realize that denying speakers because of personal bias is discrimination.
First, how freaking narcissistic do you have to b to think you get to decide who is important to a group you actively oppose? Second, this kid says it’s not discrimination if we’re shutting down views people shouldn’t have…
If “banning Gavin McInnes doesn’t discriminate against conservatives because he is not a thought leader and promotes violence” the “banning Ben Jealous doesn’t discriminate against black people because he his group is outside the mainstream and he is hostile toward police officers.”
If all the university has to do is say a person doesn’t fit into their idea of an appropriate speaker and make an unsubstantiated claim that he encourages violence, they can ban anyone do anything.
allen • Sep 16, 2018 at 10:55 am
liberal bias motivated conservative on election day, I don,t think they get it.
Hermes • Sep 12, 2018 at 7:12 pm
The largest Catholic university in America, DePaul University, bans the posting of “Unborn Lives Matter” posters by DePaul’s College Republicans. The administration cites bigotry and is acting in deference to BLM, whose posters were welcome all over campus. The former Ideology is not tied to identity politics. This played out in the national media and was an embarrassment to conservative students and alum across the country. Banning or blocking Ben Shapiro (a “leading conservative thinker” to be sure) and others another black eye for DePaul. The University of Chicago, a superior academic institution, saw to it that free speech would return to Hyde Park. DePaul, by contrast, continues to assume an intolerant, anti-intellectual posture. It’s shameful and unfair to it’s student body and alumni.
DePaul’s conservatives, oppressed indeed.