Pro-Trump chalkings spark outrage
Phrases such as “Make DePaul great again,” “Blue Lives Matter”and “Trump Train 2016” were chalked on DePaul’s Lincoln Park campus late Monday night before being removed by the campus grounds crew sometime before mid-morning Tuesday.
The chalkings – which mimicked Republican candidate Donald Trump’s rhetoric, and praised conservative values and candidate Ted Cruz – caused outrage among some students on both sides of the issue. Some took to social media to voice their concerns.
“It’s sad that even at a school as diverse and accepting as DePaul, I still feel attacked,” wrote one student in a DePaul Facebook group. “But I’m staying and am gonna thrive here anyway and maybe this organization will be held responsible for their actions.”
The chalkings were organized by DePaul College Republicans, which posted photos on their Facebook page at 12:48 a.m. Tuesday morning. College Republicans President Nicole Been voiced her concern about free speech on Twitter.
“Thanks @DePaulU for limiting the free speech of all those who disagree with your agenda. Chalk is all washed away by this morning,” she wrote.
Thanks @DePaulU for limiting the free speech of all those who disagree with your agenda. Chalk is all washed away by this morning.
— Nicole Been (@Nicole_been) April 5, 2016
In an email, Been wrote that College Republicans held the chalking “as a new way to promote Republican candidates and conservative ideas just as we would on our promotional tables and posters.”
“I am surprised by the assumptions people are making about our intent and who we are as people is not reflected by what others are calling us,” she wrote. “I can say all assumptions on the pages I’ve seen are false about timing and intent.”
[UPDATE: DePaul’s president responds, university clarifies chalking policies]
The movement, known widely as #TheChalkening, has occurred at several universities across the country – including the University of Illinois, Emory University, Kansas University and the University of Michigan – sparking outcries from students both about freedom of speech and racism.
In a statement, the university said that campus grounds crews made an independent decision to remove the chalking in part because of its content.
“After some investigation, it turns out this happened for two reasons. First, the crew regularly cleans up chalk messages on our sidewalks. This is a part of their duties. Secondly, some among the crew considered the messages inflammatory. The crew has agreed to consult about such matters in the future.”
“The university has policies on political campaigning activities on campus, free speech and the manner in which we conduct ourselves with respect for all affected by our speech. In the next few days, we will send a more comprehensive statement reminding the campus community of these policies in this particularly charged political time in the United States.”
Student organizations may use facilities for partisan political movements — as long as it is clear that they do not represent the views of the university — and individuals may post political flyers and slogans in their rooms, as long as it is not posted for public viewing. Chalking is allowed outside the Student Center, though university policy states that “messages may not contain profanity or may not abuse, assail, intimidate, demean, victimize, or have the effect of creating a hostile environment for any person or group of people based on any of the protected characteristics in the University’s Anti-Discriminatory Harassment Policy.”
However, it remains to be seen whether or not College Republicans were in violation of any of these policies. Vice President for Student Affairs Gene Zdziarski said this issue demonstrates that there is some confusion about what political campaigning is allowed.
“We are in the process of addressing this with the student organization responsible for creating, and the staff who removed, the chalkings,” Zdziarski said. “Our next steps will be to work on closing this knowledge gap and clarifying practice soon with a campus communique. As we move through the campaign season, we ask that all members of the university community become familiar with and abide by the ‘Political Campaign Activity’ policy.”
This tension comes after a year fraught with difficult speech on campus and in DePaul Facebook groups.
“I’m disgusted but not surprised, because these thing happen all the time on campus,” junior Michael Lynch said. Lynch, who also met with fraternity leaders after one of their members wrote racially loaded statements in a DePaul Facebook group, is involved with Black Student Union, Men of Vision and Empowerment (MOVE) and is a student executive board member of the Steans Center.
While he said he respects free speech and the right to support a candidate, he also said that Trump’s racist comments do not need to be included in the conversation and have no place on campus.
Moving forward, Lynch is hoping to meet with Latino student leaders, College Republicans, Young Americans for Freedom and other members of the DePaul community to end what he sees as an ongoing issue.
“I think it’s important to note that as we are in the midst of an intense political season, we remember that each of us has the right to our own, personal opinion,” Student Government Association President Vanessa Cadavillo said. “However, it is times like this that remind us that as a Vincentian community we must do everything we can to respect one another and take that into consideration in the way that we deliver our beliefs.”
Cadavillo said that SGA, as part of the President’s Diversity Council, is working to collect feedback and implement initiatives to help underrepresented groups on campus. These actions — including cultural competency training and the formation of six task forces — stemmed from a meeting between BSU and DePaul President Fr. Dennis Holtschneider, C.M., earlier this year.
“What happens is that students don’t get reprimanded or disciplined for them, so it happens again, and we have to respond again,” Lynch said. “It happens again and again and again, because no one is looking at the problem as a whole.”
Editor’s note: A previous version of this story said the chalkings were also organized by Young Americans for Freedom. A YAF representative confirmed that some of its members were involved, but College Republicans organized the chalkings.
yort • Apr 16, 2016 at 12:05 pm
If chalk can ruin a university’s reputation, then what was the reputation before the chalk? I never heard of this university , so it must be top notch!
JFK38 • Apr 15, 2016 at 5:22 pm
She feels attacked? That girl does not know what attack means, good God. Dumbing down words like attack, racist, sexist are not such a good thing. I did learn two new words this week though, I am apparently a Xenophobe, and a I think it was either a cis or a his gender, it was very confusing so I looked them up on wiki-pedia which I just recently found out is not actually a source of accurate information. I am also no longer a sexist female but a misogynist or misogynistic female. o wait I mean cis gender, so sorry 🙁
Howard Wyrick • Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41 pm
“While he said he respects free speech and the right to support a
candidate, he also said that Trump’s racist comments do not need to be
included in the conversation and have no place on campus.”
Really? Then none of the courses at DePaul cover Hitler, the Nazis, Mussolini, any US president during slavery in the US, any monarch or ruler in history who held or expressed racist or offensive thought, beliefs and/or ideology? No offensive theater, literature, religions, history, psychology, nothing? Wow. What liberal arts courses are taught at DP?
andy 123 • Apr 15, 2016 at 8:27 am
Trump’s racist comments? What were they? Quote him? Snowflake liberals are so whacky that its not even funny.
zencycler • Apr 14, 2016 at 6:10 pm
Trending on Twitter sometime soon – virtual pro-Trump chalking of the DePaul sidewalks, buildings, and even the backsides of any Anti-Trump person who makes the news (and thus becomes fair game). Easy to Photoshop and attach any picture on a tweet, so we just need a good hashtag to go with this:
Ideas?
#EatMyChalkDePaul
#WeShallOverChalk
#ChalkDePaulForTrump
#Liberty&Chalk4All
#FuchalkYouDePaul
Anyone else have a better idea for this hashtag??
Liberal Hater • Apr 14, 2016 at 12:29 pm
The people who run universities are sniveling cowards who are enabling spoiled little a-holes to be useless human beings. Pathetic cowards. The administration should be fired,
IloveMarineLaPen! • Apr 14, 2016 at 12:05 pm
Sue the college for violating the 1st amendment . Take away their money let them have the Mizzou Effect .Mizzou couldn’t PAY any one to attend there right now.
Do the same here, get them for free speech. You can do it . Or tell them no more money until you up hold the 1st amendment.
Don’t let this rest. Get em.
sara albrecht • Apr 10, 2016 at 12:36 pm
As a former “proud’ DePaul alum I am disgusted by the action that the University has taken toward free speech and the blatant censorship it has displayed. I am not a supporter of Trump but I do wholly support his right to run and respect the thousands of people that do support him. Just as I do not agree or support President Obama, but I do respect the office of the president. I never thought I would live in a country/city where this kind of attitude does not prevail. I will no longer be supporting DePaul financially and as disappointed as I am with the demise of their basketball program–this is FAR worse and deeply disturbing
kay kay bay • Apr 8, 2016 at 11:55 am
Hands up don’t shoot didn’t happen, which means black lives matter was founded on a lie. This group DePaul is bowing to shares those same principled fantasies. Racism is an excuse to use when your intellect can’t win an argument. As a black man I have to laugh to keep from crying from all the cuckery going on at universities.
dividendhunter • Apr 7, 2016 at 8:37 am
I’ve really never been so disappointed to be a DePaul graduate. How did we go from fighting to make sure everyone’s voices are heard to limiting what someone says in public because you don’t personally agree with it? This is such a disappointing black mark on DePaul’s record and the students who cried foul have a lot of growing up to do before they are even remotely prepared for what the world outside of the college bubble is like. Count my donations out moving forward. I’d never support an administration with such weak conviction in free speech.
roccolore • Apr 6, 2016 at 6:33 pm
Democrats = fascist cowards and crybabies afraid of chalk.