In the evening of a day already marked by controversial rhetoric, more than 100 students descended upon the quad late Tuesday afternoon to speak out against the appearance of self-proclaimed “internet supervillain” Milo Yiannopoulos at a campus event later that night.
The students – some of whom represented established activist groups and others who stood in solidarity – took to airing their grievances against the university and hate speech just hours before colliding with conservative attendees and Yiannopoulos himself on the quad after the event was disrupted.
“We are constantly talking about being inclusive and diverse,” junior Michael Lynch said. “However, when students of color, low income backgrounds and marginalized communities speak up, the response is, ‘Stop being so sensitive.’”
While many said that Yiannopoulos’ appearance at DePaul and platforms – such as equating feminism to cancer – were problematic, several students voiced concerned about what they said is an ongoing problem with intolerance at the university, and its failure to enact measures to end it.
“The problem isn’t (Yiannopoulos) – he’s one of many. The problem is why this private institution in Chicago in 2016 thinks it’s okay to give a platform to hate,” he said.
Earlier Tuesday, “F— Mexico” was found painted on the Quad just feet from where the protestors spoke, which the DePaul President Rev. Dennis Holtschneider condemned as a hateful slur. The still-unknown perpetrator was caught by Public Safety and apprehended by the Chicago Police Department.
Charia McDonald, a resident assistant in University Hall, asked what the university would do to “make me feel safe in my own house.”
“I live right there, and I saw that,” she said, referring to the paintings Tuesday. “I don’t feel safe in my own home, and I pay to be here.”
Laura Springman, one of the leaders of Feminist Front, echoed the sentiment. The target of a tweet from Yiannopoulos earlier in the day, which featured a photo of her and other Feminist Front members with the message,“This is what a DePaul feminist looks like,” Springman was disappointed in the university for allowing the event to go through.
“I think that it’s unacceptable that DePaul is condoning the fact that a speaker is coming who has attacked students directly,” Springman said. “I just think that’s really inconsiderate. I pay tuition dollars. I shouldn’t have to feel unsafe on campus.”
“I shouldn’t have to feel like the speaker that came is actively against me and my friends and stuff like that,” she said. “It’s just a really uncomfortable environment and it was not something I wanted to deal with today.”
Others like senior Kiara Farmer pointed to incidents like April’s chalking, during which College Republicans — which organized the Yiannopoulos event — wrote phrases such as “Build a Wall” and “Blue Lives Matter” on campus. The university erased the chalkings and cited its policy against political markings on campus, and College Republicans defended their actions as free speech.
Farmer, who is also an RA, said the chalking marked a definitive shift in campus climate, causing her to feel unsafe on campus.
“I’m just very hurt that DePaul didn’t do more when the chalkings occurred, because if they had, we wouldn’t have had people come back and write slurs in oil,” she said. “We’re not feeling sensitive, we’re just not okay with what’s happening.”
Yiannopoulos and several of his supporters have argued that colleges provide a coddling environment for students, shooting down the notion of a “safe space.” At the rally, students pointed to the need for an open environment to voice concern about what they deem as hate speech.
“It is important for you to feel free to say that ‘I feel unsafe here,’” freshman Anais Donald said.
Though many at the rally voiced their agreement with free speech, they also said that there is a difference between free speech and hate speech.
“This isn’t about being a Republican or a Democrat, this is about someone saying something hateful to a group of people that is directly aimed at them, and saying we have the audacity to call them out for it,” freshman Anais Donald said. “Because I have a brown face, I am wrong for saying I am offended by your actions such as saying we should build a wall to stop immigration.”
While most attendees stood in solidarity, around five or six men holding up pro-Donald Trump signs stood to counter the event. The men were registered guests for the Yiannopoulos event, but not DePaul students.
Since they were non-DePaul students on university property for an event other than the one they signed up for, Public Safety asked them to leave. The men at first refused, but dispersed once told the Chicago police would be called if they persisted.
Leaving the quad amid chants of “Racists, sexists, anti-gays, right wing bigots, go away,” the group marched toward the Father Egan statue outside the Student Center, where several faced heated arguments from a cameraman from a conservative outlet who recorded them. Public Safety and several DePaul administrators warned him to remain on public ground. He was later ejected from inside the Student Center by Chicago police.
Contrary to their original plan, the group then entered the Student Center, chanting outside the first floor conference room where Yiannopoulos was speaking. While several tried to enter, increased security prevented them from doing so. After a few began banging on the doors of the event, several other students urged protesters to remain calm.
After two protesters inside the event interrupted it, Yiannopoulos, attendees and protesters spilled outside, erupting into a chaotic mass. Protesters barred entry into DePaul buildings and urged conservative supporters to leave, chain linking arms in front of the Schmitt Academic Center and west side of the Student Center.
Once Yiannopoulos left in a car, splinter groups from both sides faced off in heated discourse for more than an hour across campus and in front of the Student Center.
Related:
- Protesters shut down Yiannopoulos speech
- Storify: Yiannopoulos event turns chaotic as protesters storm stage
- Quad painted with Anti-Mexican slur
Josh b ny • May 31, 2016 at 7:57 am
This former liberal is voting trump because I’m sick of this left wing pc lunacy it’s gotten to be so overbearing I can’t take it anymore
Cassie Devereaux • May 29, 2016 at 7:30 pm
Man, I despise Yiannopaulos. The man is vermin.
But, he has a right to speak. Is it hate speech? Some of what he says is. He’s catagorically mocked transgender people on Twitter…. not anyone specifically, just as a whole. I consider it hate speech, absolutely. Not in least, because I am trans. But he has a right to speak it.
Hate speech is not excluded as a seperate catagory from free speech. If it was, free speech wouldn’t be free. What he says is vile (and pretty sophomoric, actually), and his fondness for Nazi memorabilia (look it up) is disturbing. But he has the right to speak, and the campus conservatives are have a right to bring him there. DePaul not only has the right to bring folks like Yiannopaulos, they have the RESPONSIBILITY to. Yeah, he’s a neocon clown. But their job is to bring many voices, offering many perspectives, in the service of giving students a well rounded look at the issues of the day. College is, at best, one of the few institutions these days where you can’t always surround yourself with people to fuel your confirmation bias. You don’t have to agree with a speaker to profit from their presentation, and the best thinkers are willing to hear someone out even if they are presenting an opinion they find appalling. Absolutely, you have a right to protest, but have enough respect for the first amendment to let him be heard. Westboro Baptist was outside my county courthouse when I got my liscence to marry. Their speech has beyond hateful, and more disgusting than I care to recount and we had to bear it in order to exercise our right as citizens to marry. It was frightening. But they had a right to do what they did.
Oh, and all the people talking about having a right to feel safe because they pay to be there? Welcome to society. Unless you’re homeless, squatting, or living off someone else, you’re paying to live where you do. I’m sure all the fine people surrounding you in Chicago working hard to afford their rents feel like they’re paying to be there and it should be safe. Difference is, ‘not safe’ to these folk looks like gun violence, and ‘not safe’ to you means graffiti. Can you appreciate the difference? I lived in Chicago in the mid 90’s, worked hard, and most nights had to listen to gunfire as I went to sleep. I had to see a young man gunned down in a drive by shooting. The price of my rent didn’t buy me a “right to feel safe”, your tuition doesn’t buy you immunity to what some jackass with spray paint does when drunk in the wee hours. Reflect on just how ahead of the curve you are that this is a concern and be grateful for what you have. A safe space is for the therapist’s office and the 12 step group. The rest of the world gets messy.
Your entitlement is appalling, and you’ve made of yourselves a disgrace. Do better.
Ham P Nose • May 27, 2016 at 8:39 pm
The attendees’ lives were endangered when the administration made the security officers stand down.
Dion E. Black • May 27, 2016 at 12:44 pm
Can someone explain to me what “hate speech” is and where Milo advocated hate speech? I’ve listened to him speak at five other schools. I’ve never heard him preach intolerance for anything other than illogical arguments and conclusion that are not based in fact. How does an article bring up hate speech without defining the term?
Pointing out what Milo thinks are the problems with modern feminist thought is not hateful. Saying that the facts don’t support the existence of rape culture isn’t hate. Saying that minorities in the U.S. should take personal accountability and work to put themselves in a position to succeed is not hateful.
Edward Ward took over when Milo said “Micro Aggression aren’t real”. That statement doesn’t sound hateful to me. You might find it rude or dismissive or lacking in empathy, but none of those things are hateful or a call to remove anyone’s ability to live in peace. People keep using terms as a means to control speech they do not want to hear.
When they want a man to be silent they use “male privilege” or “mansplaining”
When a person calls for an investigation of a rape allegation before punishing the accused, they call that person a “rape apologist” or a “woman hater.”
When someone says micro-aggressions don’t exist, they call them a “Racist” or that they use “hate Speech”.
It is creating a cataclysm where none exists because they think those sweeping generalizations will win them the argument. Milo stands up to that mess–as he should–by insisting that the argument have logic and merit rather than pleas to emotion and illogical.
dvrmte • May 26, 2016 at 8:36 pm
Those students are going to be ill prepared to meet and compete in the real world. They will be crushed.
Luigi Valentino • May 26, 2016 at 11:03 am
DePaul University disgusts me for allowing Disorderly Conduct and Disturbing the Peace to be trumped by the illusion of “free speech” by the black lies matter racist lunatics. Edward Ward, who started the disruption at this event, is a pathetic communist-fascist agitator. He is a DISGRACE to DePaul. His VIOLATION of FREEDOM of SPEECH and DISORDERLY CONDUCT/ DISTURBING the PEACE is in the ongoing tradition of moronic, anti-democratic activists. He is a DISGRACE to all blacks who want to succeed by RESPECTING the Rules of Law and Democracy.
Gerald • May 25, 2016 at 11:45 pm
Milo Yiannopoulos’s endorsers are generally good-looking people. Yiannopoulos’s detractors are physically ghastly, without exception. Coincidence?
Havid Damburger • May 25, 2016 at 9:46 pm
Well, one group of people went to the moon and another group of people are still trying to perfect clean drinking water. I think one is better than the other…
Mr Wolf • May 26, 2016 at 8:11 am
The Bell Curve in full display here.
SGT Ted • May 25, 2016 at 5:44 pm
Headline should read ‘Students Call for Censorship of Speech They Don’t Like.” Because that’s what this talk of “hate speech” is.
Bobby Obvious • May 25, 2016 at 5:22 pm
Crossing Depaul off the list of schools for my kids. For a better run down of what happened: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/university-admins-surrender-to-violent-protesters-shutter_us_57454738e4b00853ae7b5ae3
Lee Quick • May 25, 2016 at 10:45 am
Wow DePaulia university what an embarrassment your school has become. Celebrating the rude acts of the BLM protests… So sad how many students do not believe in the freedom of speech, but it’s not surprising because universities have become liberal indoctrination centers with safe spaces & white shame. BLM has MLK rolling in his grave… it’s a disorganized, violent bandwagon that crumbles more & more every time they make an appearance.
“If the headlines for the Milo event were ‘Christian Minister Physically Threatens LGBT Speaker at University Event’, the leftists would be all over it”
Deyin Lemin • May 25, 2016 at 10:38 am
A very biased article from depaulonline, Brenden Moore, and Kirsten Onsgard.
They failed to mention that the protesters storm the stage and threatened to punch Milo in the face. And the security guards, who Depaul forced Breitbart to pay for, refused to intervene and refused to save Milo to safety. But of course, only leftists’s safety are the ones that matter.
I wonder if they will censor my comment to call them out on the bias of their article.
Sven Åke Svensson • May 26, 2016 at 7:46 am
In the evening of a day already marked by controversial rhetoric, more than 100 students descended upon the quad late Tuesday afternoon to speak out against the appearance of self-proclaimed “internet supervillain” Milo Yiannopoulos at a campus event later that night.
JdPater13 • May 27, 2016 at 11:34 am
The security didn’t refuse.
Before the event the administrators demanded they pay even more money for more security to try and make them cancel. It was a BoC but they went ahead and got extra security.
THEN when it started happening, the administration demanded that the security stand down and do nothing. Why they get to tell the security what to do, I do not know. Yet that was reported in an unbiased version of this story.
Nate Brown • May 25, 2016 at 9:53 am
These sorts of protests are just handing the election to Donald Trump. Soon America will be at a point where SJWs don’t get what they want because the only way to get what they want is to find a good job and be a productive member of society. The time of race baiting, SJW triggering, etc is coming to an end.
Crow_T_Robot65 • May 27, 2016 at 8:46 pm
They are not likely to get good jobs at all. I own a business and let me tell you I would NEVER hire someone who has a degree in Victimology (i.e. Gender Studies, Afrikana Studies, etc.). That would be like begging for a law suit since they get offended by the slightest thing and I don’t want to reward people for actively seeking to dismantle Western Civilization.
popehentai • May 25, 2016 at 9:23 am
“protestors don’t know what hate speech actually is” would be a more accurate headline. For people claiming to feel unsafe they sure do know how to make others ACTUALLY unsafe.
Havid Damburger • May 25, 2016 at 9:19 am
It’s amazing how people with no cultural experience or genetic comprehension for democracy, liberty and freedom always revert to their authoritarian roots of tyranny.
They are merely inferior humans, Their ideas are inferior, their methods are inferior and their societies are inferior. It’s simply 4 billion years of evolution acting itself out.
Olivia Joy Lehnertz • May 25, 2016 at 9:15 am
And here I hate to say it, but I think what happened at DePaul shows that freedom of speech will ultimately dissipate if our generation of millennials doesn’t stop this hysteria.
As a college student who is eager to learn and hear ALL opinions, I find it so disheartening that you can’t even go to a talk anymore without others shutting it down. In a supposed war against intolerance, these activists are attempting to demonize and sensor in a hateful, not civil, way.
The fact that this is happening at universities, of all places, is truly horrifying to me…if an institution of higher learning changes it’s mission from intellectual questioning and discovering, to safety…it will ultimately lose it’s reason for existing.
It’s quite interesting to me how a lot of these Leftist groups often miss the mark in terms of the point they are trying to get across…at another one of Milo’s talks at American University, a young black man lined up for the Q&A session (which is another reason why I don’t understand the need to disrupt, when after EVERY SINGLE ONE of Milo’s talks, he allows for about an hour of question and answer…) and said he was physically threatened by Black Lives Matter on his way into Milo’s talk. His question was, what do I say to Black Lives Matter activists who say things like this to me when all I want to do is go listen to a talk? And here I will paraphrase Milo’s eloquent response, in which Milo said that those physically threatening and aggressive activists are essentially guilty of the WORST kind of racism: that suggest that all black people must think alike. He continues with this, “If you believe that the civil rights struggle matters at all, if you believe in the fight for blacks to have an equal footing with whites in this country, if you believe it is an important goal to hear black voices, hear mine: not every black person supports Black Lives Matter, not every gay person supports the gay lobby, not every woman is a feminist, and this kind of identifying politics, that crucifies people if they step outside their racial or sexual groups in terms of ideology is the worst sort of bigotry. So, if you wonder why there aren’t more people of color supporting these sorts of ideas, you might want to pull out a mirror.”
At a different talk, Milo was asked on what the best way to go about abolishing bigoted speech was. To which he replied, he doesn’t think bigoted speech is a bad thing. And I agree!! I think it’s so important to hear from EVERYONE! How can you really formulate any opinions if you haven’t heard from all sides? I want speech of all kinds!
A great example of this is the British National Party in the UK. For those not familiar, it is a far-right nationalist party that was formed in the 80’s and taken over in the 90’s by Nick Griffith, who was racist , as was the party. Out of anxiety and fear of immigration and the general changing nature of local communities people began voting for the BNP, not because they were racist or bigots, but more or less out of fear. Here’s what happened; when the media embargo was lifted on the BNP, Nick Griffith was set to appear on the BBC question time for 1 hour. At the time, the BNP had taken over several counsels in Britain (obviously not a great moment in their history) and of course the BBC was criticized relentlessly for interviewing the guy, for giving him a platform to speak. When people saw Nick Griffith on the BBC and saw what his true opinions were and what his true nature was….they stopped voting for him, and this hateful party dissolved. It is no longer a British force.
In the words of Milo yet again….the best way to deal with someone who differs from your opinion is to give them FULL GLARE OF THE SPOTLIGHT. So my challenge to the students at DePaul who chose to behave this way-if you REALLY think Milo Yiannopoulos “spreads nothing but hate” “is a useless bigot” “homophobe” “racist” “sexist” whatever-let him speak. My fear is that students who are so ANGRY and so incapable of listening is because….these are opinions that they’ve never heard before, they are actually hearing opinions other than those from their Social Justice 101 professor.
On a panel at the University of Massachusetts, Steven Crowder was asked a question about political correctness being a barrier on speech, upon which he was interrupted by someone shouting “WHY ARE YOU ALL WHITE” (real intelligent) , with regards to the speakers on the panel. Crowder’s reply was , “On this panel you have a gay British Trump supporter, a lifelong registered feminist Democrat, and a French Canadian christian conservative. You ask about diversity because the only diversity you don’t care about is intellectual diversity.”
I’m not going to apologize for the length or content of this post because I believe this needed to be said. I might not agree with everything that comes out of Milo Yiannopolous’ mouth, but WOW he is an eloquent speaker, well read, gives a voice to young people in a refreshing way, and above all values TRUTH. He is absolutely, 100% worthy of respect.
Right to free speech > right to feel comfortable
Bob • May 25, 2016 at 9:04 am
Headline is wrong. Students call for end of Free Speech at DePaul University.
Ann Inquirer • May 25, 2016 at 8:54 am
Special Snowflake “Charia McDonald, a resident assistant in University Hall, asked what the university would do to ‘make me feel safe in my own house.'” It looks like you won’t be safe in your own house since the campus police won’t ensure safety of you or anyone else, ie a speaker.
Somehow the idea that there can be free speech has completely gone over the heads of any one who disagrees with the Right. We see the Left does not have protesters, but Terrorists threatening people, and students & BLM are turning into jackboot Brownshirts before our eyes. FYI Content of speech is protected by the Constitution, backed up by SCOTUS whether anyone likes it or not.
legtingle • May 25, 2016 at 9:36 am
Not to argue, but a nice big can of wasp spray is easier to manage and easily can hit a face 20 feet away. Agonizing. Milk doesn’t help.
Funny how “security” got the 4 Trump guys out pronto because they had the audacity to stand on a common side walk and counter protest the Special Snowflakes that were in a dither about a private event in a paid for venue on campus. But, gee….Security watched the savages threaten and poke at Milo. PATHETIC.
DontBeBias • May 25, 2016 at 8:51 am
its pretty fukin amazing how terrible of a job this website and article did at actually representing how it went down. These pictures make protestors look peaceful, they were the opposite, they were aggressive, hateful and borderline violent. 10 people stormed the stage while MILO was giving a calm and peaceful and lawful speech, screamed in his face, grabbed the microphone away and started chanting, effectively silencing their free speech and ruining the day for everyone there. Then outside in the quad, they surrounded people that attended and screamed hateful things, circled them to intimidate them and screamed curses in their faces demanding that these fellow students leave, just because they have different opinion then them. If you have Instagram I strongly encourage you to follow or at least visit the page of Luimarco. He has posted real videos of the event and you can see these morons acted like animals
Ann Inquirer • May 25, 2016 at 8:56 am
correction, “acted like TERRORISTS.” However if you want to keep the animal analogy, use VITPERS.
legtingle • May 25, 2016 at 9:37 am
You can see the entire madness on YouTube…search Milo DePaul. Wake up everybody.
iroots.org activism • May 25, 2016 at 8:46 am
Sad reaction. You don’t get to judge those you disagree with and brand their speech as “hate speech” because you don’t like it. Increasingly, I think thoughtful liberals are even realizing that this isn’t ‘liberal.’ These SJW types have an almost religious ideology where perceived group grievences trump all other discourse. Think of actual oppression around the world, ISIS, caste systems (untouchables in India), on and on. This kind of ideology that equates speech as violence is embarassing and demeans actual violence in the world. Can’t really blame the young kids though, they are being taught this junk from professors. Those courses need (see profile/page) to be suspended.
Terry • May 25, 2016 at 8:16 am
Based on what videos there are, it would the appear the only hate speech was inflicted by BLM folks. NO TOLERANCE OR OPENNESS OR RESPECT! Shameful mob suppression of 1st Amendment rights, lack of courage on part of the school and security. There’s an old expression that applies to college in this case…’you reap what you sow’.
Shawn Kelly • May 25, 2016 at 8:02 am
OMG!! I’m suffering #TrigglyTrauma and now need a #SuperMax-SafeSpace.
legtingle • May 25, 2016 at 9:39 am
I think BLM has a new star: #$2BLMdancingcrackhotrigger
C Michaels • May 25, 2016 at 7:39 am
Led around by the noses by those that can hardly academically qualify to get into college, is no way to go thru life. Grow a set wimps. You don’t follow the lowest common denominator. Unless you to want to eb the lowest common denominator.
Robert 1344 • May 25, 2016 at 7:32 am
I’ll be impressed when DePaul reveals who painted the antii-Mexico slogan, but I know they won’t. Usually these things turn out to be hoaxes.
RU_Serious • May 25, 2016 at 7:54 am
If CPD arrested them it will be a matter of public record.
Migeulito • May 25, 2016 at 7:20 am
Sue the crap out of this school. If anyone’s safety was threatened here it was Milo’s, not the minorities who usurped the platform via their minority privilege and went on to berate, belittle and demean someone, contrary to their own beliefs and preaching. This generation will be the downfall of America. Bunch of pansies.
G Bailey • May 25, 2016 at 7:16 am
Just for BLM’s information, if I had a ticket to the event, and they blocked my way in, there would be a physical altercation. They don’t get to choose for me where and when I get to walk somewhere. So go ahead and try to trample on my rights. I’m not afraid to defend them by any means necessary. Milo RULES.
RU_Serious • May 25, 2016 at 6:51 am
Well anti-free speech protesters, how do you think you look now? Are you proud of yourselves? Do you even realize how foolish, intolerant and fascist you all appear by violently shutting down speech with which you disagree? Do you realize how childish and incapable of functioning in the real world you appear?
JdPater13 • May 27, 2016 at 11:31 am
They look cool to their other ignorant racist friends and that’s all they care about
Marco Ramirez • May 25, 2016 at 6:31 am
Depaul has sadly devolved into a third or fourth tier school. Administrators, faculty and students who are mere leftist activists and apparently afraid of thoughts and views different from their own. At that point, an institution ceases to be a “university”.
mdsman • May 25, 2016 at 5:55 am
Sadly, you students have allowed your school to become a joke and an embarrassment.
Whilst it is unfair to paint all because of the absurdity and stupidity of a few, that is just a reality of life.
Until such time that the mature and rational students stand up and demand that this nonsense be curtailed, I can gaurantee you that I, nor any of my peers at the senior levels of corporations, will entertain CV’s from DePaul graduates.
Unfair? Yes. But, that is the price you pay for your complacency which is, in fact, passive support.
Enjoy your “Safe Spaces” as I doubt that many of you will enjoy “Safe Jobs”
MonkeyProud • May 25, 2016 at 9:36 am
Their ignorance would be funny if it weren’t so perverse.
Jake the libertarian • May 25, 2016 at 4:45 am
I am so disappointed at this reaction. Most of the people calling the speaker a racist have never heard the man talk. He is openly gay (as am I) and is simply critical of the hyper sensitivity that exists among students these days. It’s kind of a good point kids… The world doesn’t owe you anything and nobody is going to tiptoe around your feelings. Sticking your fingers in your ears and disrupting a legitimate academic debate is literally anti-educational… As well as espousing the same intolerance you claim to fight against.
In my mind the leaders of this disaster are simply Luddite thugs and should be unceremoniously thrown out of school. With out at least some reaction from DePaul I a, very sure they will be hit with a serious loss in attendance and donation. We’re I an alumnus, this would keep my dollars away.
Toughen up kids. nobody cares if your upset… And if your college pretends to, I feel sorry for you when you get out, because the rest of the world definitely will not. You try this shit in a job, you’ll be fired and probably arrested before get on stage… And there won’t be a soul on earth who gives a damn. Good luck
GTR003121 • May 25, 2016 at 2:28 am
What an embarrassment these students are, to be so afraid of differing viewpoints. The world is not a “safe space”, nor should it be. These special snowflakes are in for a rude awakening once they depart this disgraceful Uni.
Deyin Lemin • May 26, 2016 at 7:05 pm
So agree!!
Eggard Snark • May 25, 2016 at 1:34 am
hate speech you mean free speech? The left hates free speech. ftfy
Trander6face • May 25, 2016 at 1:24 am
Never expected BLM to be homophobic and misogynistic and anti-Semitic… DePaul university should be ashamed… The whole security should be fired and 2000 $ should be refunded… Silencing a gay journalist in the name if “hate speech” is slander and DePaul university should issue an apology… Many Milo supporters are also assaulted (both men and women)… All these “activists” should be arrested and kicked out of the university
Ann Inquirer • May 25, 2016 at 8:58 am
Never expected? BLM has changed their name to BlackLiesMatter. The students there were Not “activists,” call them what they are, Terrorists. And yes, terrorists should be arrested and kicked out.
popehentai • May 25, 2016 at 9:25 am
How could you not expect it from a group that beatifies criminals, and ignores the slaughter of innocent people in their own communites? But what do i know? Even asking about it is somehow “racist”.
MonkeyProud • May 25, 2016 at 9:37 am
What misconception were you under if you thought there was anything positive about BLM?
JdPater13 • May 27, 2016 at 11:26 am
Administrators made the security stand down and not do anything.
David Buck • May 25, 2016 at 1:14 am
The fact remains that a student group paid privately to have an event and was cancelled violently. Regardless of whether or not you agree with Milo’s politics (and for the record, I can find nothing that even comes close to being empirically considered “hate speech”), disagreeing ALONE is not enough reason to shut down an event, particularly in this manner. The “chaotic mass” you are referring to was anti-milo protestors trying to start fights where there were none to be had. This is a biased and completely unresearched article.
Eggard Snark • May 25, 2016 at 1:36 am
the guy who hijacked the event isn’t even affiliated with the school just some random weirdo off the street.
MonkeyProud • May 25, 2016 at 9:39 am
He’s a homeless alumnus.