The DePaulia

Filed under Opinions

Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Supporters of same-sex marriage and LGBTQ advocates celebrate at the Chicago Pride Parade June 28. Some conservative religious leaders now fear losing their tax-exempt status after the Supreme Court's decision to legalize same-sex marraige. (Olivia Jepson / The DePaulia)

Supporters of same-sex marriage and LGBTQ advocates celebrate at the Chicago Pride Parade June 28. Some conservative religious leaders now fear losing their tax-exempt status after the Supreme Court’s decision to legalize same-sex marraige. (Olivia Jepson / The DePaulia)

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage on June 26, prompting celebrations nationwide and temporarily hijacking practically everyone’s Facebook Newsfeed.  While most Americans embraced the decision as a civil rights triumph, a conservative minority found the ruling to be a potential danger for religious liberty. Conservative religious institutions now fear that if they are to deny same-sex couples the rights and services they provide straight couples, they could lose their tax-exempt status.

This fear is validated by the 1983 case surrounding Bob Jones University. The Supreme Court ruled that, because the university prohibited interracial dating and marriage, it would no longer be considered tax exempt. The court declared that by forbidding interracial couples the same rights as couples of the same race, it was rivaling “fundamental national public policy.” Many conservatives believe the Bob Jones University case could be used to challenge religious institutions that refuse to provide same-sex couples with the same rights they would a straight couple.

Opposition to the Supreme Court’s ruling worry that, as Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. wrote in his dissent, put freedom of religion into question.

“Today’s decision, for example, creates serious questions about religious liberty,” he wrote. “Many good and decent people oppose same-sex marriage as a tenet of faith, and their freedom to exercise religion is — unlike the right imagined by the majority — actually spelled out in the Constitution.”

Unlike the opposition, the Supreme Court majority opinion interpreted the Constitution as validating the right for same-sex couples to marry, rather than protecting those who would deny those rights to use religion as their excuse.

“Under the Constitution, same-sex couples seek in marriage the same legal treatment as straight couples, and it would disparage their choices and diminish their personhood to deny them this right,” the majority opinion wrote. In other words, legalizing same-sex marriage does not take away a conservative’s right to practice their religion as they see fit. Rather, it ensures that institutions that refuse to provide same-sex couples with the same rights as straight couples do not do so on the government’s dime.

[box]Read: SCOTUS gay marriage ruling ushers in change[/box]

It is important to remember that religious institutions are not incapable of supporting LGBTQA rights. DePaul University — the nation’s largest Catholic university — openly supports the LGBTQA community. DePaul has a number of programs and services that exist, according to the DePaul website, “to promote foster and support a campus environment that is inclusive of people from all sexualities and gender identities.” DePaul and other religious universities like it serve as proof that religion does not solely act as a means of validating bigotry.

The Supreme Court’s ruling does not prevent those who oppose same-sex marriage from speaking their minds. It does not force conservative religious institutions to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies. It merely ensures that if an institution is not providing the same rights to all couples, it will not be doing so with the support of the American government.

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    Don’t call Israel an apartheid state

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    Open letter to the DePaul Board of Trustees: Make your investment profile public

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    Not a death sentence: Why we need to change the way we talk to cancer patients

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    Kanye West’s pro-Trump views don’t add up

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    Puff puff pass – in class?: How vapes are changing the futures of teenagers

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    Light-skinned Latinxs can be privileged, too

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    The death of a smile: It’s time to stop forcing women to bear the weight of constant happiness

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    Where are frats heading?

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    SGA president formally endorses “We are DePaul”

  • Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling

    Opinions

    The SGA candidates want your vote: “DePaul for All” and “We are DePaul” make statements

The Student News Site of DePaul University
Religious liberty questioned after same-sex marriage ruling